A meeting format where participants contribute at different times rather than simultaneously — using recorded video, shared documents, or threaded discussions instead of live calls.
An async meeting is a collaborative exchange that happens over time rather than in real-time. Instead of scheduling a live video call, participants contribute on their own schedule — watching recorded updates, commenting on shared documents, or responding in threaded discussions.
Async-first doesn't mean "no meetings." It means fewer, better synchronous meetings. When you move status updates, progress reports, and information sharing to async formats, the live meetings that remain become more focused and more valuable — they're reserved for debates, brainstorming, and relationship building that genuinely require real-time interaction.
The paradox is that async-first teams actually need smarter scheduling, not less scheduling. When synchronous meetings are rare, each one becomes higher-stakes and harder to coordinate (especially across timezones).
Not everything should be async. Remote team scheduling best practices suggest keeping these synchronous: difficult conversations, creative brainstorming, onboarding sessions, team bonding, and any decision where real-time debate will produce a better outcome than sequential responses.
The goal isn't to eliminate live meetings — it's to make each one count by reserving synchronous time for what truly needs it. Smart scheduling tools help by protecting focus time and ensuring the meetings that remain are positioned optimally.
Use async for: status updates, information sharing, feedback collection, decision-making that doesn't need real-time debate, and any meeting where half the attendees don't need to speak. Use live meetings for: sensitive conversations, brainstorming, relationship building, and urgent decisions.
That's their biggest advantage. Instead of finding a time that works for everyone (often impossible across 8+ timezone hours), each person contributes during their working hours. A team spanning New York to Tokyo can have a complete 'meeting' within 24 hours without anyone staying up late.
A meeting that repeats on a set schedule — daily, weekly, biweekly, or monthly — without requiring re-booking each time.
Read moreMeeting TypesA scheduled meeting between exactly two people — the simplest and most common meeting format, used for interviews, coaching sessions, check-ins, and consultations.
Read moreMeeting TypesCoordinating a meeting time that works for three or more participants — exponentially harder than one-on-one scheduling due to the combinatorial complexity of overlapping availability.
Read moreBusiness MetricsAutomatically blocking uninterrupted work periods from being booked over by meetings, preserving deep work time on your calendar.
Read moreGoing async-first doesn't eliminate meetings — it makes the remaining ones higher-stakes and harder to schedule. Remote teams need better scheduling, not less.
The average knowledge worker spends 31 hours per month in meetings. Most of those meetings could be emails. Here's how to fix your meeting culture.
Remote teams waste hours on timezone math and 'when works for you?' Slack threads. Here's a practical guide to scheduling that actually works across time zones.
Free to use. Set up in two minutes.